- PRSA Code of Ethics
- The profession's core ethical framework in the US, built on six values (advocacy, honesty, expertise, independence, loyalty, fairness) and provisions covering free flow of information, competition, disclosure of information, safeguarding confidences, conflicts of interest and enhancing the profession. It is enforced by expulsion from membership rather than by law, so it functions as a professional standard, not a regulation.
- Disclosure of client relationships
- The obligation to reveal who is paying for a communication — to journalists, to audiences and in third-party placements. Undisclosed sponsorship is the single most common way PR work becomes an ethics story about the firm rather than a coverage story about the client.
- FTC endorsement guides
- The Federal Trade Commission's guidance on endorsements and testimonials, revised in 2023, requiring that any material connection between an endorser and a brand be disclosed clearly and conspicuously. It reaches influencers, employees, incentivized reviewers and the brands and agencies that hire them.
- Material connection
- Any relationship between an endorser and a brand that a reasonable audience would not expect and that could affect the weight given to the endorsement — payment, free product, employment, family ties, contest entry. Its existence, not its size, triggers the disclosure duty.
- Pay-for-play and sponsored-content labelling
- Paying an outlet or contributor for placement or favourable treatment. It is not illegal when disclosed and labelled as sponsored or paid content, and it is deceptive when it is presented as independent editorial. The label has to be visible before the audience engages, not buried at the end.
- Native advertising disclosure
- Paid content designed to match the form and function of the surrounding editorial. The FTC's guidance turns on the net impression: if a reasonable consumer would think it was independent journalism, the disclosure is inadequate no matter what the fine print says.
- Regulation FD
- The SEC rule requiring that when a public company discloses material non-public information to analysts or selected investors, it must disclose it broadly and simultaneously (or promptly, if unintentional). It is why embargoed briefings, selective press exclusives and off-hand executive remarks are a legal exposure for a listed company, not just a comms decision.
- Embargo and exclusive
- An embargo gives multiple journalists information early on the agreement that nothing publishes before a set time; an exclusive gives one outlet the story alone in exchange for depth and prominence. Breaking an embargo — or quietly giving a nominal exclusive to two outlets — costs the relationship, and journalists share the fact widely.
- On the record, background, deep background, off the record
- The four attribution levels. On the record: everything is quotable and attributable by name. On background: usable but attributed to a described source ('a company spokesperson'). Deep background: usable as the reporter's own framing with no source reference. Off the record: not usable at all. The terms must be agreed before the information is given, never after, and definitions vary enough between outlets that they should be stated explicitly.
- Source verification
- Confirming that a claim, statistic, credential or quote is real and correctly attributed before it goes into a pitch or release. A single fabricated or misattributed figure retires a spokesperson's credibility with a beat reporter permanently.
- AI-generated pitches and quotes
- Outreach or executive quotes drafted by a language model. The practical risk is detection and discard — journalists report recognising generic AI-written pitches and deprioritising the sender. The ethical risk is a quote attributed to a human who never said it and a statistic the model invented.
- Media list
- The working list of journalists, editors, producers and independent writers who genuinely cover a topic, with beat, outlet, contact preference and recent coverage. A researched list of forty is worth more than a purchased list of four thousand, which is how most pitches end up in spam.
- Pitch
- The short, personalised message proposing a story to a specific journalist. It has to answer why this, why now, why you and why this reporter, in the length of a phone screen.
- Hook
- The angle that makes a story interesting to that outlet's audience rather than to the client. Most rejected pitches describe a company; accepted pitches describe a change, a conflict, a number or a person.
- News peg
- The current event, data release, regulatory change or anniversary that makes a story timely today. Without a peg, an editor's answer is almost always 'not now' rather than 'no'.
- Newsjacking
- Inserting a client's expert perspective into a breaking story while it is still developing. It rewards speed and genuine expertise and punishes obvious opportunism, especially around tragedy.
- Press release vs media alert vs backgrounder
- A press release is the formal announcement written for quotation and distribution; a media alert is the who/what/when/where logistics note inviting coverage of an event; a backgrounder is the deeper non-promotional reference document supplying context, history and technical detail a reporter needs to write accurately.
- Boilerplate
- The standing 'About [company]' paragraph at the foot of a release. It is the description that gets copied verbatim into coverage and increasingly into AI-generated summaries, which makes it worth far more attention than it usually gets.
- Media kit
- The assembled press resources — fact sheet, boilerplate, executive bios and headshots, logos, product images, B-roll, past coverage — kept current and downloadable so a journalist on deadline never has to ask.
- Byline / contributed article
- An article written under a client executive's name and published by an outlet as editorial contribution rather than paid placement. Trade publications run them widely; most require exclusivity and prohibit promotional language about the author's own product.
- Op-ed
- An opinion piece submitted to a news outlet arguing a position. It requires an actual argument, standing to make it and a timely peg, and major outlets accept a very small fraction of submissions — regional and trade placement is usually the realistic target.
- Source request (HARO-style)
- Marketplaces where journalists post what expertise they need and sources respond — the model popularised by Help a Reporter Out and now served by Qwoted, Featured, MentionMatch and Source of Sources. High volume, low hit rate, and effective only when responses are fast, specific and genuinely expert.
- Desk-side briefing
- A short, off-news meeting between an executive and a journalist to build understanding and relationship before there is anything to announce. It is an investment, not a placement tactic, and it is what makes a later pitch get read.
- Media tour and press junket
- A sequence of briefings with multiple outlets, either in one city or across several, often around a launch or trade show. A junket where the brand pays travel and hospitality carries disclosure obligations for the journalist's outlet and reputational risk for both sides.
- Launch embargo strategy
- The plan governing who is briefed when before an announcement — tier-one exclusive, embargoed briefings for trades, wire crossing at hour zero, and the sequencing of blog, customer and analyst notification so nothing leaks ahead of the story that matters most.
- Tier-one vs trade coverage
- Tier one is the large general-audience outlet with mass reach and low buyer density; trade press reaches a small audience that is almost entirely buyers, specifiers and peers. Trade coverage usually moves the business; tier one usually moves the boardroom.
- Impressions vs reach vs readership
- Impressions counts potential exposures and double-counts the same person; reach counts unique people; readership estimates how many actually read the piece. Most PR reports quote impressions because it is the largest number available, which is exactly why it persuades nobody senior.
- Share of voice
- A brand's proportion of the total coverage or conversation in its category over a period, versus named competitors. It is the most defensible comparative earned-media metric because it normalises for how much the whole category was covered.
- Message pull-through
- The percentage of coverage that actually carries the key messages the campaign set out to place. It measures whether the story was told the way it was pitched, and it is the metric that most often exposes coverage that looked good and said nothing.
- Sentiment
- Whether coverage reads positive, neutral or negative toward the subject. Automated scoring handles volume but misreads sarcasm, industry idiom and neutral-but-damaging framing, so credible programs sample and human-verify.
- Quality of coverage scoring
- A weighted score per article combining outlet relevance, prominence (headline or passing mention), message pull-through, spokesperson quotation, visuals, links and sentiment. It replaces clip counting with a defensible ranking of what each placement was worth.
- AVE (advertising value equivalency)
- The discredited practice of pricing coverage at what the equivalent ad space would have cost, sometimes multiplied by an invented 'credibility multiplier'. It confuses cost with value, ignores whether the coverage was positive, and cannot be reconciled with the fact that nobody bought anything.
- Barcelona Principles
- AMEC's international framework for communications measurement, first set in 2010 and updated to version 3.0 in 2020. They require goal setting and measurement, measurement of outcomes rather than only outputs, effect on organisational performance, both qualitative and quantitative methods, transparent and replicable measurement, and they state explicitly that AVEs are not the value of communication.
- Outputs vs outcomes vs impact
- Outputs are what the program produced (releases sent, placements landed); outcomes are what changed in the audience (awareness, understanding, preference, action); impact is what changed in the organisation (pipeline, hiring, valuation, policy, risk avoided). Reporting stops at outputs precisely where budgets get cut.
- Referral traffic and branded search lift
- The two hard digital signals a placement leaves: clicks arriving from the article, and the rise in people searching the brand by name afterwards. Branded search lift often survives when referral traffic does not, because most readers never click the link.
- Awards program economics
- Entry fees, tiered submission deadlines, category proliferation and paid gala tables mean many 'awards' are revenue products. The test is whether the judging panel is named and independent and whether anyone outside the industry has heard of the award.
- Speaking placement
- Securing conference and panel slots through call-for-papers submissions, program committee relationships and sponsorship-adjacent tracks. A keynote is earned; a 'sponsored speaking opportunity' is bought, and audiences increasingly tell the difference.
- Analyst relations
- The structured discipline of briefing industry research firms, responding to inquiry, participating in vendor evaluations and correcting the record. Analysts influence enterprise shortlists directly, and unlike journalists they will usually tell you what they think before publishing.
- Holding statement
- The pre-drafted first response issued within minutes of an incident: what is known, what is being done, care for those affected, and when more will follow. Its job is to occupy the vacuum before speculation fills it, not to explain the incident.
- Dark site
- A pre-built, unpublished crisis web page or site section ready to go live in minutes with statements, facts, contacts and updates. It gives the organisation a citable source of record when its main site and social channels are overwhelmed.
- Spokesperson designation and escalation matrix
- The pre-agreed decision of who speaks for the organisation at each severity level, and the matrix defining which incidents escalate to whom, within what time, with what approval path. Both must exist before the incident, because the argument about who speaks is what costs the first hour.
- Tabletop exercise
- A simulated crisis run against the plan with the real decision-makers in the room, testing notification, drafting, approval and spokesperson readiness under time pressure. It reliably exposes the approval bottleneck that would otherwise be discovered live.
- Apology framework: statement of regret vs admission
- A statement of regret expresses sympathy for what happened; an admission accepts responsibility for causing it. The difference carries legal and insurance consequences, so the language is drafted with counsel — but audiences read hedged non-apologies accurately, and the reputational cost of sounding evasive is often larger than the liability being protected.
- Reputation risk register
- A maintained inventory of the scenarios that could damage the organisation, scored by likelihood and severity, each with an owner, a pre-drafted position and a trigger for escalation. It converts crisis communications from improvisation into preparation.
- Media training
- Rehearsed preparation for interviews: message discipline, bridging from a hostile question back to the point, handling hypotheticals and silence, and knowing that nothing said with a reporter present is truly off the record unless it was agreed in advance.
- Retainer vs project vs performance-based fees
- A retainer buys ongoing capacity and relationships, usually monthly against a staffing plan; a project buys a defined deliverable such as a launch or crisis response; performance-based pricing ties fees to placements or outcomes. Performance pricing is uncommon in earned media for a structural reason — the agency does not control the publication decision — and where it exists it tends to pull work toward low-quality guaranteed placements.